By EUGENE
OMILO
Container
Freight Stations (CFS) play a critical role in trade and in the development of
the national economy despite the negative publicity arising out of the general
lack of knowledge on the role of CFSs and the lack
of a clear framework by the government on the licensing and operations of the
facilities.
By providing additional cargo
storage and diverse clearance facilities to port users, the facilities are one
stop centers, making logistics and supply chain dynamics easier and impacting
positively on overall costs of doing business for the benefit of the economy.
CFS’s in
general have given the port of Mombasa additional cargo holding capacity which
would otherwise not have been available if the KPA had continued to handle
these goods within the port area.
The
maritime regulator, Kenya Maritime Authority, also concedes that the absence of structures to
sustain efficiency and quality of maritime transport services is a challenge, the
role of CFSs cannot be undermined.
“Without CFSs, the congestion at the port of Mombasa
could have been impossible to manage in view of the limited infrastructure at
the moment,” says KMA Director General Mrs. Nancy Karigithu.
Mombasa
Container Terminal General Manager Mr. James Rarieya who is also a member of
the CFS Association’s executive committee observes that it has been virtually
impossible to extend the stacking capacity further within the present port
limits due to the natural barriers that surround the container terminal.
“CFS’s
have therefore provided the much needed relief to the port of Mombasa by
providing this critical capacity,” says Mr. Rarieya.
He
continues that this factor alone has contributed to the port being able to
handle 770,000 twenty feet equivalent units (TEUs) in 2011, well beyond the
actual port container handling capacity at 250,000 TEUs.
This
capacity has over the years been increased to 500,000 through investment by the
Kenya Ports Authority (KPA) in equipment with high handling capacity and paving
of areas previously designated for stacking general cargo to a level that can
hold containerized cargo.
Though critical to regional trade,
the CFS’s have continued to face various challenges with major amongst them
being what operators refer to as ‘negative cargo transfer policy issues.
The policy does not allow transit
containers to reach the CFSs.
According to Mr. Wilfred Oluga who
is the vice chairman of the CFS Association and Managing Director of Awanad
Enterprises, there is significant increase in container through put at the port
of Mombasa which shows that there will be a massive
congestion problem if KPA and KRA
maintains the status quo in the handling of transit cargo.
Paradoxically, he says, there is
idle space at the CFSs most of which are underutilized, registering container
occupancy at very low levels, some as low as 20% utilization.
“There is relative stability and
growth in the greater East and Central Africa region which is largely served by
the port of Mombasa. Countries like South Sudan are fast becoming important
players in the import business further straining KPA’s capacity to handle
transit containers,” he explains, to show why KRA should consider releasing
transit cargo to the CFSs.
The trend has been as follows in
the recent past:
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
436,671
479,355
585,367
615,733
618,816
Further, operators say dwell time of
transit containers is longer under the current arrangement which also
contributes to the pile up.
Though KRA’s has cited the fear of
cargo diversion as the main reason why transit cargo cannot be released to
CFSs, Mr. Oluga says operators are willing to put up additional bond to address
the concerns.
“Considering all these concerns, one can see why it makes
a lot of sense to allow transit containers to be handled at the CFSs which
currently operate below 50% space utilization,” argues Mr. Oluga.
But even with increased bonds, Kenya Maritime
Authority Director General Mrs. Nancy Karigithu thinks otherwise.
She says
with the current lack of clarity on treatment of delays arising from the
various parties involved in cargo clearance and transfers and the attendant
penalties that are passed on to importers, this may generate more outcry if
CFSs were to handle transit traffic.
“ The ideal situation would be to transfer such
cargo to a KPA facility away from the port such as the Inland Container Depots
in Embakasi, Kisumu or Eldoret or any other
facility outside the port but which is fully under KPA control,” she
suggests.
On the other hand, Mrs. Karigithu pegs the
underutilization of CFSs to the fact the CFSs have grown in number while volume
of cargo has not changed much.
“Cargo is nominated by KPA to CFSs, and the volumes
handled by a CFS depend on the performance of a shipping line such that if a
shipping line is doing very well, the CFS will be able to handle greater
volumes,” she explains.
Ends…
No comments:
Post a Comment